<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Chrome OS Update &#187; chrome os security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.googlechromeosupdate.com/tag/chrome-os-security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.googlechromeosupdate.com</link>
	<description>News &#38; Updates about Chrome OS</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 12:39:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Actual Reason Behind &#8216;Chrome OS Security&#8217; Uproar: &#8216;Anti-Virus Industry&#8217; Afraid of Going Out of Business</title>
		<link>http://www.googlechromeosupdate.com/chrome-os-security/</link>
		<comments>http://www.googlechromeosupdate.com/chrome-os-security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 15:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digg out]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rumor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speculations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrome os security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.googlechromeosupdate.com/?p=38</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google execs have been keeping sharp silence since the Chrome OS news broke out but the blogosphere is reacting just the opposite. Bloggers and news journalists are fantasizing everything they can, just to keep the Chrome OS buzz alive, whether the concerns being raised are relevant or not. And right now, Google&#8217;s statement of building [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-44" title="out of business" src="http://www.googlechromeosupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/out-of-business.jpg" alt="out of business" width="210" height="198" />Google execs have been keeping sharp silence since the Chrome OS news broke out but the blogosphere is reacting just the opposite. Bloggers and news journalists are fantasizing everything they can, just to keep the <em>Chrome OS buzz </em>alive, whether the concerns being raised are relevant or not.</p>
<p>And right now, Google&#8217;s statement of building  <em>fool-proof security standards</em> in Google Chrome OS is <a href="http://news.google.com/news?pz=1&amp;ned=us&amp;hl=en&amp;q=chrome+os+security" target="_blank">getting over-exaggerated</a> to a large extent by the online media.</p>
<p>The security pundits are whole-heartedly questioning Google&#8217;s claims of building a <em>Malware-free Operating System</em>. Few of the logical justifications of security experts are somewhat true but still, the actual statement has been largely mis-interpreted, making a mountain of a molehill.</p>
<p>This is the <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/07/introducing-google-chrome-os.html" target="_blank">statement</a> that&#8217;s causing the uproar&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p><em>And as we did for the Google Chrome browser, we are going back to the basics and completely redesigning the underlying security architecture of the OS so that <span style="color: #800000;">users don&#8217;t have to deal with viruses, malware and security updates</span></em><em>. It should just work.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Media has gone absurdly far that it has started relating <em><a href="http://www.scmagazineus.com/Security-redesign-coming-in-Google-Chrome-OS/article/139757/" target="_blank">Twitter security breach </a></em><a href="http://www.scmagazineus.com/Security-redesign-coming-in-Google-Chrome-OS/article/139757/" target="_blank">with vulnerability</a> of <em>Google Chrome OS. </em>It&#8217;s fine that many of the official Twitter documents which were recently hacked, were hosted on cloud based <em>Google docs </em>service<em>, </em>but we reckon the skeptics missed out a point <a href="http://blog.twitter.com/" target="_blank">made pretty clear by Twitter co-founder Biz Stone</a> saying</p>
<blockquote><p><em>This attack had nothing to do with any vulnerability in Google Apps which we continue to use.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>We do agree that no operating system can be <strong>100% malware-free</strong>. We also agree that there may be even more challenges for Google while carving out a Web based Operating system, which is bound to be more open and would heavily rely on cloud based applications. But this doesn&#8217;t mean that Google&#8217;s statement about Chrome OS Security standards is waguely wrong.</p>
<p>One can better interpret the <em>questionable Google statement</em> as &#8220;<em>implementation of never-before and highly resistent security standards within Google Chrome OS&#8221;.</em></p>
<p>Now, imagine an operating system, which is <strong>not completely fool-proof</strong> but has very rare chances of malware attacks and least vulnerability to viruses. Won&#8217;t you love such an OS ? That&#8217;s exactly what Google is eyeing for.</p>
<p>But there&#8217;s another hidden reason behind all these objections, being raised majorly by <em>Security experts</em> and <em>Anti-virus companies</em>. Suppose, if Google actually succeeds in building a <em>Fool-proof Operating System </em>then it will be one of the major highlights of <em>Chrome OS</em> in competing against <em>Microsoft Windows</em>.</p>
<p>And if, <em>Google</em> starts hurting long lived Windows dynasty of Microsoft badly, then it won&#8217;t be just Microsoft but countless of <em>Anti-virus firms</em> and <em>computer security</em> companies, who will be at the risk of going out of business.</p>
<p>The possibility is quite easy to realize. If <em>Malware-free Google Chrome OS</em> succeeds in stealing some 30-40% of <em>OS market share</em> from Microsoft within a span of, say 4-5 years from its launch then it will mean that only 55-65% market will actually require<em> security experts</em> or <em>anti-virus softwares</em> for staying Malware<em>-free</em>. This may jeopardise Anti-virus industry to a large extent.</p>
<p>It is analogous to a situation when everybody becomes <em>healthy on earth and there&#8217;s a rare possibility of any disease to spread across, meaning <strong>no need of medicines</strong> <strong>ever</strong>. Won&#8217;t that cause whole Medical industry to go out of business. </em></p>
<p><em></em>This same sort of feeling is one major reason behind the whole controversy around the Google statement on <em>Chrome OS security plans</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.googlechromeosupdate.com/chrome-os-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

